|
Post by SoulTrainOz on Jul 18, 2006 1:57:36 GMT -5
Hi all,
Seen as though we were having a discussion about this case in the news area, I thought we might actually bring it to this area, as it is a specific case.
I find it appalling that they courts will not allow DNA testing of the evidence, to see if the evidence shows that Mauriceo was not the shooter. And also the fact that the other two, who testified against him were at the crime, I just dont think that it is very fair.
SoulTrainOz
|
|
|
Post by falcon66 on Jul 20, 2006 18:55:57 GMT -5
this is the same issue that is in the Darlie Routier case....judge won't allow DNA testing
|
|
|
Post by SoulTrainOz on Jul 20, 2006 19:02:24 GMT -5
If there is the possibility with DNA to prove that the person did not committ the crime, why are they so against testing?? If there is DNA then it should all be tested.
SoulTrainOz
|
|