Post by SoulTrainOz on Jul 28, 2006 7:58:15 GMT -5
Virginia's electric chair, a relic of barbaric times, needs to go. But so too does the notion that there's a humane way to kill a human.
Brandon Wayne Hedrick decided last week that if the commonwealth of Virginia was going to kill him, he'd rather go strapped to the electric chair than to a gurney. Something about the electric chair struck Hedrick as less cruel than the needle.
His choice made people squirm, including Gov. Tim Kaine, who said this week on Washington Post Radio that he'd prefer to end the state's policy of giving convicted murderers a choice.
Kaine prefers to relegate Virginia's electric chair to the museum housing former instruments of death: stones, the guillotine, gallows, gas chamber, a firing squad's rifles, and the hooded executioner's mask and ax. All of these represent once-acceptable methods for exacting the ultimate punishment.
Today, society finds these instruments as barbaric as high-noon hangings in the public square and prefers that the death penalty be delivered in a clinical manner. Proponents can then remark that lethal injections are no crueler than putting a sick dog to sleep and much kinder than the gruesome murders the condemned committed.
Hedrick's visit to the electric chair, as jolts of juice fried his
internal organs, might not have been as serene for observers to watch as a lethal injection. But it might actually have been a more tolerable death, if such a thing exists. If delivered properly, the electric chair kills efficiently and quickly.
The same may not be true of lethal injections, even though they appear to deliver a serene end. The American Veterinary Medical Association in 2002 banned a similar chemical thingytail for putting animals to sleep because one drug masks pain and suffering caused by the others. While observers witness a motionless inmate slipping quietly into a tidy death, it is quite possible that the inmate is fully aware and feeling excruciating pain.
At least 5 states have stayed all executions until courts resolve whether the existing method subjects inmates to unconstitutional pain and suffering.
The lawsuits allege that sedative doses have been inadequate to
anesthetize inmates. And the inmates couldn't alert officials that they were in severe pain because they were paralyzed by another drug. Some states, Missouri being the latest, tried to remedy that by requiring an anesthesiologist to be on hand, but have found no willing doctors.
The lawsuits challenge a process that witnesses can't necessarily see. But lethal injections can be botched, although not quite as dramatically as when a body catches fire from a poorly executed electrocution. Recently, Ohio prison staff struggled 90 minutes to find a usable vein while the inmate begged to be killed some other way. Other inmates over the years have violently choked and writhed; drugs have stopped working because straps constricted veins or chemicals clogged the IV tube; needles have popped out.
One day America should come to this inescapable conclusion: There really isn't a humane way to kill a human being, even one who deserves to die.
(source: Editorial, Roanoke Times)
Brandon Wayne Hedrick decided last week that if the commonwealth of Virginia was going to kill him, he'd rather go strapped to the electric chair than to a gurney. Something about the electric chair struck Hedrick as less cruel than the needle.
His choice made people squirm, including Gov. Tim Kaine, who said this week on Washington Post Radio that he'd prefer to end the state's policy of giving convicted murderers a choice.
Kaine prefers to relegate Virginia's electric chair to the museum housing former instruments of death: stones, the guillotine, gallows, gas chamber, a firing squad's rifles, and the hooded executioner's mask and ax. All of these represent once-acceptable methods for exacting the ultimate punishment.
Today, society finds these instruments as barbaric as high-noon hangings in the public square and prefers that the death penalty be delivered in a clinical manner. Proponents can then remark that lethal injections are no crueler than putting a sick dog to sleep and much kinder than the gruesome murders the condemned committed.
Hedrick's visit to the electric chair, as jolts of juice fried his
internal organs, might not have been as serene for observers to watch as a lethal injection. But it might actually have been a more tolerable death, if such a thing exists. If delivered properly, the electric chair kills efficiently and quickly.
The same may not be true of lethal injections, even though they appear to deliver a serene end. The American Veterinary Medical Association in 2002 banned a similar chemical thingytail for putting animals to sleep because one drug masks pain and suffering caused by the others. While observers witness a motionless inmate slipping quietly into a tidy death, it is quite possible that the inmate is fully aware and feeling excruciating pain.
At least 5 states have stayed all executions until courts resolve whether the existing method subjects inmates to unconstitutional pain and suffering.
The lawsuits allege that sedative doses have been inadequate to
anesthetize inmates. And the inmates couldn't alert officials that they were in severe pain because they were paralyzed by another drug. Some states, Missouri being the latest, tried to remedy that by requiring an anesthesiologist to be on hand, but have found no willing doctors.
The lawsuits challenge a process that witnesses can't necessarily see. But lethal injections can be botched, although not quite as dramatically as when a body catches fire from a poorly executed electrocution. Recently, Ohio prison staff struggled 90 minutes to find a usable vein while the inmate begged to be killed some other way. Other inmates over the years have violently choked and writhed; drugs have stopped working because straps constricted veins or chemicals clogged the IV tube; needles have popped out.
One day America should come to this inescapable conclusion: There really isn't a humane way to kill a human being, even one who deserves to die.
(source: Editorial, Roanoke Times)